Associations Between Academic Rank and Advanced Bibliometric Indices Among United States Academic Radiologists

Publication date: Available online 28 September 2016
Source:Academic Radiology
Author(s): Anthony Jiang, Luke A. Ginocchio, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
Rationale and ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate associations between traditional and advanced bibliometric indices with academic rank for radiologists in the United States.MethodsFaculty web pages were searched to classify 538 members of the Association of University Radiologists as assistant (n = 212), associate (n = 128), or full (n = 198) professors. Radiologists' publication and citation records were extracted from Scopus to compute the following indices: publication count, citation count, h-index, i-10 index, hc-index, m-quotient, e-index, and g-index. Analysis of variance, multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed.ResultsAll indices were significantly different among the three groups (P ≤.001), progressively increasing with increasing rank (eg, mean publication count of 17, 41, and 128 among assistant, associate, and full professors, respectively; mean citation count of 205, 687, and 3622, respectively; mean h-index of 5, 11, and 27, respectively). At multivariable analysis, the h-index (reflecting publications and citations) was a strong significant independent positive predictor of associate (β=+0.32, P <.001) or full professor (β=+0.26, P <.001) status, whereas the m-quotient (adjusted h-index that is greater for more rapid publication) was a strong significant independent negative predictor of associate (β=−1.87, P = .009) or full professor (β =−4.97, P <.001) status. The models exhibited moderate goodness-of-fit (r² = 0.534–0.655; P <.001). The model for predicting at least associate professor achieved area under the curve 0.876 (sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 88.8%). The model for predicting full professor achieved area under the curve 0.925 (sensitivity 85.5%, specificity 86.1%).ConclusionWhen controlling for the h-index, more rapid publication, as indicated by the m-quotient, was negatively associated with radiologists' academic rank, indicating the additional influence of career duration in promotions decisions.



http://ift.tt/2d9oxzg