In Situ Operating Room–Based Simulation: A Review

Publication date: Available online 11 March 2017
Source:Journal of Surgical Education
Author(s): Lily Owei, Christopher J. Neylan, Raghavendra Rao, Robert C. Caskey, Jon B. Morris, Richard Sensenig, Ari D. Brooks, Daniel T. Dempsey, Noel N. Williams, Joshua H. Atkins, Dimitry Y. Baranov, Kristoffel R. Dumon
ObjectiveTo systematically review the literature surrounding operating room–based in situ training in surgery.MethodsA systematic review was conducted of MEDLINE. The review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, and employed the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) structure to define inclusion/exclusion criteria. The Kirkpatrick model was used to further classify the outcome of in situ training when possible.ResultsThe search returned 308 database hits, and ultimately 19 articles were identified that met the stated PICO inclusion criteria. Operating room–based in situ simulation is used for a variety of purposes and in a variety of settings, and it has the potential to offer unique advantages over other types of simulation. Only one randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing in situ simulation to off-site simulation, which found few significant differences. One large-scale outcome study showed improved perinatal outcomes in obstetrics.ConclusionsAlthough in situ simulation theoretically offers certain advantages over other types of simulation, especially in addressing system-wide or environmental threats, its efficacy has yet to be clearly demonstrated.



http://ift.tt/2mbueiE