Thank you for your letter and for allowing us to respond. We acknowledge that dr. Mangano et al. agree with us on the importance and relevance of the study. Regarding the first comment we present here the method we used for sample size calculation based on the flap viability outcome for each flap using the following equation n = [ (Z α/2+ Zβ)/(P1-P2)] (P1q1 + P2q2) [1], where:
http://ift.tt/2t7p9wQ
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Πέμπτη 29 Ιουνίου 2017
Response to comments on: A prospective randomized cost billing comparison of local fasciocutaneous perforator versus free Gracilis flap reconstruction for lower limb in a developing economy
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Summary Insulinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours that classically present with fasting hypoglycaemia. This case report discusses an un...
-
The online platform for Taylor & Francis Online content New for Canadian Journal of Remote Sen...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου