Rural Rotations at Core: Rarefied Exposure or Real Experience?

Publication date: Available online 12 July 2017
Source:Journal of Surgical Education
Author(s): Christopher Brown, Tarig Abdelrahman, Neil Patel, Awen Iorwerth, John Pollitt, Mark Holt, Wyn G. Lewis
ObjectiveSurgical rotations involving rural General Hospitals (rGH) are frequently associated with recruitment challenges, partly because of adverse perceptions regarding distances from social support networks and training opportunities. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of core surgical training rotations involving rGHs when compared with urban hospitals in a single UK Deanery.DesignOnline Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme portfolios from 163 core surgical trainees (CST) were examined related to postlocation, operative experience, workplace-based assessments, and academic achievement. Of the 163 CSTs, 27 had completed at least 50% of their 2-year training posts at rGHs and were compared with 136 control CSTs completing rotations in urban general and teaching hospitals (uGH). The primary outcome measures were MRCS pass rate and success at national ST3 selection.SettingA core surgical training program serving a single UK Deanery.ParticipantsConsecutive 177 CSTs appointed to a single UK Deanery between 2010 and 2016.ResultsSuccess at MRCS and national ST3 selection were similar for CSTs from rGH vs uGH rotations—MRCS success: 70.4 vs 72.8% (p = 0.816), and ST3 success: 22.2% vs 27.0% (p = 0.811). Median rGH vs uGH curriculum-based outcomes were operative case load: 378 vs 422 (p = 0.300); workplace-based assessments completed: 79 vs 94 (p = 0.499); audits performed: 4 vs 4 (p = 0.966); learned society communications: 1 vs 2 (p = 0.020); and scientific publications: 0 vs 0 (p = 0.478).ConclusionCST rotations including rGHs produced a different spectrum of training experience compared with uGH rotations but overall primary outcomes were similar.



http://ift.tt/2uojuGr