Resident Vitality in 34 Programs at 14 Academic Health Systems: Insights for Educating Physicians and Surgeons for the Future

Publication date: Available online 19 June 2018
Source:Journal of Surgical Education
Author(s): Linda H. Pololi, Arthur T. Evans, Janet T. Civian, Sandy Shea, Robert T. Brennan
OBJECTIVETo clarify our understanding of how the culture of residency training influences the well-being of residents, this study reports on the vitality of residents at 34 programs across the United States and identifies characteristics of the programs, institutions and residents that are associated with high resident vitality.DESIGNIn 2014 to 2015, residents nationally were surveyed using the validated C - Change Resident Survey. The survey assessed residents' vitality and 12 other dimensions that characterize residents' perspectives of the culture of the residency training programs: Self-efficacy, Institutional/program support, Relationships/inclusion/trust, Values alignment, Ethical/moral distress, Respect, Leadership aspirations, Mentoring, Work-life integration, Gender equity, Racial/ethnic minority equity, and self-assessed Competencies. Multilevel models were used to assess vitality within and across programs, and examine predictors including resident, program, and institution characteristics.PARTICIPANTSTwo thousand four hundred and fifty-two residents from 11 General Surgery, 12 Internal Medicine, and 11 Pediatrics programs at 14 U.S. academic health systems.RESULTSOne thousand seven hundred and eight residents responded (70% response rate). The mean Vitality score was 3.6 (range 1–5, where values of 4–5 represent high Vitality). There was wide variation among the 34 programs in the percent of residents who had high Vitality scores, ranging from 17% to 71%. However, the average Vitality scores within specialty (Surgery, Medicine, and Pediatrics) were not significantly different. The strongest predictors of Vitality were Work-life integration, Relationships/inclusion/trust, Institutional/program support, Res?>pect, Values alignment, and Ethical/moral distress, which together accounted for 50% of vitality variance. Individual demographics accounted for just 3% of variance.CONCLUSIONSVitality is an essential component of resident well-being, and within each specialty there are programs that have excelled in promoting a culture of high vitality. Our findings suggest that we should test interventions to enhance resident vitality by focusing greater attention on providing institutional support, aligning individual and institutional values, integrating work and personal life, and facilitating relationships, inclusiveness and trust.



https://ift.tt/2K37jmo