In Reply Peiris and colleagues commented on the null effect of vitamin D supplementation on incident cancer in the ViDA study, which is based primarily on possible differential effects on disease risk between daily vs monthly doses of vitamin D supplementation. In our article, we acknowledged that monthly dosing may be less effective than daily dosing for preventing cancer, and we agree that if this finding is true, increased variability in vitamin D levels associated with monthly dosing would be a possible mechanism. For example, daily or weekly dosing of vitamin D is more effective than bolus dosing (ie, monthly) in preventing acute respiratory infections, particularly in people with vitamin D deficiency. However, the recent null findings for incident cancer reported in the VITAL study, in which a daily dose of vitamin D was administered, suggest that the frequency of dosing is not important for cancer prevention.
http://bit.ly/2GLdDjB
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Publication date: January–February 2018 Source: Materials Today, Volume 21, Issue 1 Author(s): David Bradley http://ift.tt/2BP...
-
Summary 外阴佩吉特病(VPD)是一种罕见的皮肤疾病,常见于绝经后的白人女性,它会引起外阴周围的皮肤瘙痒或灼烧。这种疾病有不同的类型,并且在过去,所有类型的 VPD 都与乳腺、肠道和泌尿系统的恶性肿瘤(如癌症)有关。这项来自荷兰的研究着眼于皮肤非侵入性 VPD, 其中在诊...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου