Calciphylaxis: Comparison of radiologic imaging and histopathology

Publication date: Available online 9 March 2017
Source:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Author(s): Charles L. Halasz, David P. Munger, Heather Frimmer, Michael Dicorato, Sandra Wainwright
BackgroundThe current gold standard for diagnosis of calciphylaxis is a skin biopsy specimen demonstrating calcification of small-caliber arteries or arterioles.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare diameters of calcified vessels seen in skin biopsy specimens and radiology images of patients with calciphylaxis.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients with known calciphylaxis from 2009 to 2016 at a community hospital who had both skin biopsy specimens and radiology images taken as part of their routine care. Vascular calcification was compared in skin biopsy specimens and radiology images.ResultsSeven patients were identified. Small-vessel calcification as fine as 0.1 to 0.3 mm was identified on plain films in 3 patients; 0.1 to 0.2 mm by mammography in 3 patients, and 0.1 to 0.2 mm by computed tomography imaging in 1 patient, nearly as fine a resolution as on histopathology.LimitationsThis was a single-center study with limited sample size.ConclusionRadiologic imaging might enable more rapid diagnosis of calciphylaxis when skin biopsy specimen is pending or not available.



http://ift.tt/2mnelHJ