Energy efficiency of ambulation–A comparison of various orthopaedic possibilities

Publication date: Available online 19 October 2017
Source:Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Author(s): Jerin Mathew, Kavitha Raja, Febin P. Baby, B. Basima
BackgroundIn most developing countries, accessibility for people using walking aids is limited due to architectural and environmental barriers. As observed from anecdotal accounts, even a minor orthopaedic injury/disorder may restrict a person's ambulation due to fatigue associated with using walking aids. Hence this study was undertaken with the following objective.Objectiveto estimate the magnitude of energy consumption using energy expenditure index (EEI) during gait under different conditions.DesignRepeated measures design (within subjects study).SettingSchool.ParticipantsTen healthy, typical young adults between 17 and 25 years of age.Outcome measureEnergy Expenditure Index (EEI) was estimated for each of the conditions of the study using consistent measurement procedures.Resultsthe energy consumption with immobilization is greater (anke-16.2%, knee-36.7% and ankle and kee-49.2%) than typical self-selected ambulation. During on ground ambulation the energy cost was greatest for axillary crutches than standard walker with ankle and knee immobilized being the highest in relation to typical ambulation (78.2% greater). Axillary crutches were more efficient than walker during stair climbing.Conclusionfor young adults a standard walker may be the right option for over-ground ambulation, when a lower limb joint in immobilized; with axillary crutch use during stair climbing.



http://ift.tt/2gpv0Id