Publication date: Available online 25 May 2017
Source:Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Author(s): Cass R. Sunstein
In recent years, governments have become keenly interested in behavioral science; new findings in psychology and behavioral economics have led to bold initiatives in areas that involve poverty, consumer protection, savings, health, the environment, and much more. Private institutions have used behavioral findings as well. But there is a pervasive and insufficiently explored question: when is it best to ask people to make active choices, and when is it best to use a default rule, which means that people need not make any choice at all? The answer depends on a form of cost–benefit analysis, which means that it is necessary to investigate whether choosing is a burden or a pleasure, whether learning is important, and whether a default rule would satisfy the informed preferences or all of most people.
http://ift.tt/2qlpMRf
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Πέμπτη 25 Μαΐου 2017
Default Rules Are Better Than Active Choosing (Often)
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Publication date: September 2017 Source: European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), Volume 43, Issue 9 http://ift.tt/2gezJ2D
-
Publication date: January–February 2018 Source: Materials Today, Volume 21, Issue 1 Author(s): David Bradley http://ift.tt/2BP...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου