Clinicopathological analysis of Large Cell Lung Carcinomas definitely diagnosed according to the New World Health Organization Criteria

Publication date: Available online 14 February 2018
Source:Pathology - Research and Practice
Author(s): Yalan Bi, Yang Qu, Zhiyong Liang, Zichen Liu, Hui Zhang, Xiaolong Liang, Yufeng Luo, Jinling Cao, Haiqing Zhang, Ruie Feng
ObjectiveThe definition of large cell lung carcinoma (LCC) has undergone an extensive modification in the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification (2015). Present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients diagnosed as LCC according to current WHO criteria.MethodsLCCs diagnosed based on the previous WHO classification were reevaluated, and 17 cases of LCC were finally identified at Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Beijing Chest Hospital between 2009 and 2015. The clinicopathologic features were examined and EGFR and KRAS mutations were tested. Survival of the patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 64 years (range: 40-78). Most patients were male (64.7%) and about half of the patients were at TNM stage III (47.1%). Morphologically, most cases (70.6%) were classic LCC. All patients were treated by lobectomy plus lymph node dissection, 2 with bi-lobectomy and 1 with complex lobectomy, and the other 2 patients were further treated by partial pericardiotomy. Ten patients received postoperative chemotherapy, while only 3 patients were treated with radiotherapy after surgery. Molecular analysis showed two cases of EGFR mutation (L858R) but without non-overlapping KRAS mutation. The 3-year overall survival rate was 48.4 ± 15.1%. Chemotherapy was the only predictive factor that is associated with the prognosis of the patients (P = 0.003).ConclusionThe clinicopathological characteristics of 17 cases of stringently diagnosed LCC were retrospectively analyzed. LCC in our study showed aggressive behavior with high recurrence and metastasis and poor prognosis. Chemotherapy was only predictive factor that is significantly associated with the prognosis of the patients. Future studies based on a larger series and long term follow-up are still needed to characterize it further.



http://ift.tt/2BuYQqw