Different Disclosed Probabilities to Receive an Antiemetic Equally Decrease Subjective Symptoms in an Experimental Placebo Study: To Be or Not to Be Sure

Publication date: Available online 20 December 2016
Source:Clinical Therapeutics
Author(s): Katja Weimer, Björn Horing, Eric R. Muth, Jenna L. Scisco, Sibylle Klosterhalfen, Paul Enck
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine whether the disclosed probability of receiving an antiemetic affects nausea.MethodsForty-eight healthy participants (mean [SD] age, 26.8 [5.4] years; 50% female) were exposed to 5 × 2 minutes of nauseogenic body rotations on 2 days. On day 2, participants were randomized to 3 experimental groups that were given different instructions concerning the probability of receiving an antiemetic remedy (100%, 50%, or 0% probability), whereas all received an inert substance. Subjective symptoms, behavioral (rotation tolerance) measures, and physiologic (electrogastrogram) measures of nausea were assessed and mediator and moderator analyses performed for effects of expectations and psychological characteristics on outcomes.FindingsDisclosed probabilities of both 100% and 50% significantly reduced subjective symptoms of nausea in an equal manner compared with the 0% probability group from day 1 to day 2. This effect was found for neither rotation tolerance nor myoelectric gastric activity. Expectations and psychological characteristics did not affect the results found. Post hoc analyses revealed that women only seem to be susceptible to this placebo effect.ImplicationsNausea is susceptible to placebo effects independent of the disclosed probability of receiving a drug and of explicit expectations. In line with placebo research, this effect is probably attributable to central mechanisms, and it is speculated that it could be related to the reward circuitry and social interactions.



http://ift.tt/2h10wug