Publication date: Available online 17 January 2017
Source:Clinical Imaging
Author(s): Tetsuro Sekine, Felipe Barbosa, Felix P Kuhn, Irene A Burger, Paul Stolzmann, Gerhard F Huber, Spyros S Kollias, Gustav K von Schulthess, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Martin W Huellner
PurposeTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET+MR with PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer.Materials and methodsContrast-enhanced PET/CT+MR was performed in 27 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. PET/CT and PET+MR were evaluated separately, and the TNM stage and factors influencing treatment were assessed.ResultsThe TNM staging by PET+MR was comparable to PET/CT (T: p=0.331, N: p=0.453, M: p=0.034). The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of treatment-influencing factors by PET/CT and PET+MR were 0.68/0.99/0.97, and 1.00/1.00/0.99, respectively.ConclusionsWhole-body staging with PET+MR yields at least equal diagnostic accuracy as PET/CT in head and neck cancer.
http://ift.tt/2jUVeSQ
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Τρίτη 17 Ιανουαρίου 2017
PET+MR versus PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer, using a trimodality PET/CT+MR system
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Summary Insulinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours that classically present with fasting hypoglycaemia. This case report discusses an un...
-
The online platform for Taylor & Francis Online content New for Canadian Journal of Remote Sen...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου