Source:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Volume 98, Issue 3
Author(s): Sara Maldonado-Martín, Peter H. Brubaker, Joel Eggebeen, Kathryn P. Stewart, Dalane W. Kitzman
ObjectiveTo evaluate the change in the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) distance relative to changes in key functional capacity measures after 16 weeks of exercise training in older patients (≥65y) who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).DesignProspective, randomized, single-blinded (by researchers to patient group) comparison of 2 groups of HFpEF patients.SettingHospital and clinic records; ambulatory outpatients.ParticipantsParticipants (N=47) randomly assigned to an attention control (AC) (n=24) or exercise training (ET) (n=23) group.InterventionThe ET group performed cycling and walking at 50% to 70% of peak oxygen uptake (V˙o2peak) intensity (3d/wk, 60min each session).Main Outcome MeasuresV˙o2peak, ventilatory threshold (VT), and 6-MWT distance were measured at baseline and after the 16-week study period.ResultsAt follow-up, the 6-MWT distance was higher than at the baseline in both the ET (11%, P=.005) and AC (9%, P=.004) groups. In contrast, V˙o2peak and VT values increased in the ET group (19% and 11%, respectively; P=.001), but decreased in the AC group at follow-up (2% and 0%, respectively). The change in V˙o2peak versus 6-MWT distance after training was also not significantly correlated in the AC group (r=.01, P=.95) or in the ET group (r=.13, P=.57). The change in 6-MWT distance and VT (an objective submaximal exercise measure) was also not significantly correlated in the AC group (r=.08, P=.74) or in the ET group (r=.16, P=.50).ConclusionsThe results of this study challenge the validity of using the 6-MWT as a serial measure of exercise tolerance in elderly HFpEF patients and suggest that submaximal and peak exercise should be determined objectively by VT and V˙o2peak in this patient population.
http://ift.tt/2lsg1Pz
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου