Benedetti-Pinto et al have raised an interesting and current topic and report observations of possible associations between average h-indices of the editorial boards of plastic surgery journals and the impact factors of their journals1. However, whilst their analysis was valid, their conclusions were badly overstated, in light of the severe limitations of the data.
http://ift.tt/2keoC9F
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Σάββατο 4 Φεβρουαρίου 2017
Over-Analysis of Minimal Data gives Misleading Conclusions: Response to Article by Benedetti-Pinto et al
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Summary Insulinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours that classically present with fasting hypoglycaemia. This case report discusses an un...
-
The online platform for Taylor & Francis Online content New for Canadian Journal of Remote Sen...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου