Thank you for your letter and for allowing us to respond. We acknowledge that dr. Mangano et al. agree with us on the importance and relevance of the study. Regarding the first comment we present here the method we used for sample size calculation based on the flap viability outcome for each flap using the following equation n = [ (Z α/2+ Zβ)/(P1-P2)] (P1q1 + P2q2) [1], where:
http://ift.tt/2t7p9wQ
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Πέμπτη 29 Ιουνίου 2017
Response to comments on: A prospective randomized cost billing comparison of local fasciocutaneous perforator versus free Gracilis flap reconstruction for lower limb in a developing economy
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Ειδοποίηση Μελετητή:[ ωτα ] [HTML] Gender, identity and material: Film screening C Brand - 2017 ftypM4V *M4V M4A mp42isom*a┌moovlmvhd...
-
Publication date: September 2017 Source: Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Volume 110 Author(s): Lucía Fernández-del-Río, Anish Nag, Elen...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου