Diagnostic accuracy of automatic normalization of CBV in glioma grading using T1- weighted DCE-MRI

Publication date: Available online 4 August 2017
Source:Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Author(s): Prativa Sahoo, Rakesh K. Gupta, Pradeep K. Gupta, Ashish Awasthi, Chandra M. Pandey, Mudit Gupta, Rana Patir, Sandeep Vaishya, Sunita Ahlawat, Indrajit Saha
PurposeAim of this retrospective study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of proposed automatic normalization method to quantify the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) with existing contra-lateral region of interest (ROI) based CBV normalization method for glioma grading using T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI).Material and methodsSixty patients with histologically confirmed gliomas were included in this study retrospectively. CBV maps were generated using T1-weighted DCE-MRI and are normalized by contralateral ROI based method (rCBV_contra), unaffected white matter (rCBV_WM) and unaffected gray matter (rCBV_GM), the latter two of these were generated automatically. An expert radiologist with >10years of experience in DCE-MRI and a non-expert with one year experience were used independently to measure rCBVs. Cutoff values for glioma grading were decided from ROC analysis. Agreement of histology with rCBV_WM, rCBV_GM and rCBV_contra respectively was studied using Kappa statistics and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultThe diagnostic accuracy of glioma grading using the measured rCBV_contra by expert radiologist was found to be high (sensitivity=1.00, specificity=0.96, p<0.001) compared to the non-expert user (sensitivity=0.65, specificity=0.78, p<0.001). On the other hand, both the expert and non-expert user showed similar diagnostic accuracy for automatic rCBV_WM (sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.87, p=0.001) and rCBV_GM (sensitivity=0.81, specificity=0.78, p=0.001) measures. Further, it was also observed that, contralateral based method by expert user showed highest agreement with histological grading of tumor (kappa=0.96, agreement 98.33%, p<0.001), however; automatic normalization method showed same percentage of agreement for both expert and non-expert user. rCBV_WM showed an agreement of 88.33% (kappa=0.76,p<0.001) with histopathological grading.ConclusionIt was inferred from this study that, in the absence of expert user, automated normalization of CBV using the proposed method could provide better diagnostic accuracy compared to the manual contralateral based approach.



http://ift.tt/2v75Hl1