Abstract
Objective
A highly-sensitive thyroglobulin assay (Elecsys® Tg II, Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) has become available for monitoring patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Here we evaluated the clinical performance of Elecsys® Tg II assay in a multicentre patients series and compare it with the established Access® Tg assay (Beckman Coulter, Brea, US).
Design
Retrospective analysis on prospectively selected patients in four thyroid cancer referral centres with uniform DTC management.
Participants
All DTC cases diagnosed, treated and followed-up in four tertiary referral centres for thyroid cancer since January 2005 (n=1456) were retrieved and predefined selection criteria were applied to prevent relevant enrollment biases. A series of 204 patients was finally selected for the present study.
Measurements
Samples had been stored at -80° C. Tg was measured by fully automated immunometric Elecsys® Tg II and Access® Tg assays in a centralized laboratory.
Results
Two hundred and four DTC were finally included. Of these, 10.8% had structural recurrence (sREC) and 81.4% showed no evidence of disease (NED) at the end of follow-up. There was a significant analytical bias between methods that cannot be used interchangeably. Using ROC curve analysis, the best basal and rhTSH-stimulated Tg cutoffs to detect sREC were 0.41 μg/L and 1.82 μg/L for Elecsys® and 0.36 μg/L and 1.62 μg/L for Access® assay, respectively. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, Tg was the only independent predictor of cancer relapse.
Conclusions
Using appropriate assay-specific cutoffs, the clinical performance of the Elecsys® Tg II assay was comparable to that provided by the well-established Access® Tg assay.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://ift.tt/2xAFRcF
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου