Patterns of care and outcomes of proton and eye plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: Review of the National Cancer Database

Publication date: Available online 28 September 2017
Source:Brachytherapy
Author(s): Alexander J. Lin, Yuan J. Rao, Sahaja Acharya, Julie Schwarz, Prabakar Kumar Rao, Perry Grigsby
PurposeTo examine national practice patterns and outcomes of eye plaque brachytherapy compared to proton external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of choroid melanoma.Methods and MaterialsDemographic and clinical data for 1224 patients with choroid melanoma treated with either brachytherapy or proton beam therapy from 2004 to 2013 were obtained from the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression and propensity score matching was used to create a 1:1 matched cohort. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate survival in brachytherapy and proton groups.ResultsMedian followup was 37 and 29 months for brachytherapy and protons, respectively. Most patients were treated with brachytherapy (n = 996) vs. protons (n = 228). Proton patients came from more urban, affluent, and educated zip codes, and they were more likely to be treated at an academic center (all p < 0.004). In the propensity-score matched cohort, 2-year overall survival was 97% vs. 93%, and 5-year overall survival was 77% vs. 51% for brachytherapy and protons, respectively (p = 0.008). Multivariate Cox regression found older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–1.09), larger tumor diameter (12–18 mm, HR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.40–4.42, >18 mm, HR = 6.41, 95% CI = 1.45–28.35), and protons (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.06–3.37) were negative prognosticators of survival.ConclusionsPatients selected for proton treatment have inferior survival outcomes compared to brachytherapy in this retrospective analysis. There may be unaccounted variables that influence survival, warranting further prospective studies.



http://ift.tt/2yLZDzJ