Environmental toxicology and omics: A question of sex

Publication date: Available online 14 October 2017
Source:Journal of Proteomics
Author(s): Xuefang Liang, April Feswick, Denina Simmons, Christopher J. Martyniuk
Molecular initiating events and downstream transcriptional/proteomic responses provide valuable information for adverse outcome pathways, which can be used predict the effects of chemicals on physiological systems. There has been a paucity of research that addresses sex-specific expression profiling in toxicology and due to cost, time, and logistical considerations, sex as a variable has not been widely considered. In response to this deficiency, federal agencies in the United States, Canada, and Europe have highlighted the importance of including sex as a variable in scientific investigations. Using case studies from both aquatic and mammalian toxicology, we report that there can be less than ~20–25% consensus in how the transcriptome and proteome of each sex responds to chemicals. Chemicals that have been shown to elicit sex-specific responses in the transcriptome or proteome include pharmaceuticals, anti-fouling agents, anticorrosive agents, and fungicides, among others. Sex-specific responses in the transcriptome and proteome are not isolated to whole animals, as investigations demonstrate that primary cell cultures isolated from each sex responds differently to toxicants. This signifies that sex is important, even in cell lines. Sex has significant implications for predictive toxicology, and both male and female data are required to improve robustness of adverse outcome pathways.Biological significanceClinical toxicology recognizes that sex is an important variable, as pharmacokinetics (ADME; absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) can differ between females and males. However, few studies in toxicology have explored the implication of sex in relation to the transcriptome and proteome of whole organisms. High-throughput molecular approaches are becoming more frequently applied in toxicity screens (e.g. pre-clinical experiments, fish embryos, cell lines, synthetic tissues) and such data are expected to build upon reporter-based cell assays (e.g. receptor activation, enzyme inhibition) used in toxicant screening programs (i.e. Tox21, ToxCast, REACH). Thus, computational models can more accurately predict the diversity of adverse effects that can occur from chemical exposure within the biological system. Our studies and those synthesized from the literature suggest that the transcriptome and proteome of females and males respond quite differently to chemicals. This has significant implications for predicting adverse effects in one sex when using molecular data generated in the other sex. While molecular initiating events are not expected to differ dramatically between females and males (i.e. an estrogen binds estrogen receptors in both sexes), it is important to acknowledge that the downstream transcriptomic and proteomic responses can differ based upon the presence/absence of co-regulators and inherent sex-specific variability in regulation of transcriptional and translational machinery. Transcriptomic and proteomic studies also reveal that cell processes affected by chemicals can differ due to sex, and this can undoubtedly lead to sex-specific physiological responses.

Graphical abstract

http://ift.tt/2z6IbXe