Improving Quality and Consistency in NRG Oncology RTOG 0631 for Spine Radiosurgery via Knowledge-Based Planning

Publication date: Available online 4 January 2018
Source:International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Author(s): Kelly C. Younge, Robin B. Marsh, Dawn Owen, Huaizhi Geng, Ying Xiao, Daniel E. Spratt, Joseph Foy, Krithika Suresh, Q. Jackie Wu, Fang-Fang Yin, Samuel Ryu, Martha M. Matuszak
PurposeConsistency and standardization of radiotherapy plan quality in multi-institutional clinical trials are always challenging, and non-protocol compliant radiotherapy plans have been shown to impact patient outcomes. This study aimed to use knowledge-based planning (KBP) as a method of producing high quality, consistent, protocol-compliant treatment plans, in a complex setting of spine SBRT on NRG Oncology RTOG 0631.MethodsAn internally developed KBP model was applied to an external validation cohort of 22 anonymized cases submitted under NRG Oncology RTOG 0631. The original and KBP plans were compared via their protocol compliance, target conformity and gradient index, dose to critical structures, and dose to surrounding normal tissues.ResultsThe KBP model generated plans meeting all protocol objectives in a single optimization when tested on both internal and protocol-submitted NRG Oncology RTOG 0631 cases. Two submitted plans that were considered to have a protocol-unacceptable deviation were made protocol compliant through the use of the model. There were no statistically significant differences in protocol spinal cord metrics (D10% and D0.03cc) between the manually optimized plans and the KBP plans. The volume of PTV receiving prescription dose increased from 93.3 ± 3.2% to 98.3 ± 1.4% (P=0.01) when using KBP. High-dose spillage to surrounding normal tissues (V105%) showed no significant differences (2.1 ± 7.3 cc for manual plans to 1.8 ± 0.6 cc with KBP), and dosimetric outliers with large amounts of spillage were eliminated through the use of KBP. KBP plans were also found to be significantly more consistent in several metrics, including target coverage and high dose outside of the target.ConclusionIncorporation of KBP models into the clinical trial setting may have a profound impact on the quality of trial results due to the increase in consistency and standardization of planning, especially for treatment sites or techniques that are non-standard.



http://ift.tt/2EXAbu0