Source:Cancer Treatment Reviews
Author(s): Rita A. Kandel, Xiaomei Yao, Brendan C. Dickson, Michelle Ghert, Snezana Popovic, Bibianna M. Purgina, Shailendra Verma, Joel Werier
BackgroundThe molecular pathogenesis of many forms of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) have been rigorously characterized in the medical literature, which may be particularly important for the diagnosis and prediction of prognosis in STS.MethodsElectronic databases (2005 to October 2016) were searched. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor and pediatric sarcomas were excluded. The eligible individual study's risk of bias and the quality of aggregate evidence were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed.ResultsOf 6674 identified articles, 70 were eligible and analyzed, covering 13 types of STS. Meta-analyses showed that the test of detecting MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization was accurate in differentiating atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma/dedifferentiated liposarcoma from benign tumors (N = 971; sensitivity = 95%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89–98; specificity = 100%, CI 89-100) or from other STS (N = 347; sensitivity = 99%, CI 72–100; specificity = 90%, CI 78–95); that the test of detecting SS18-SSX fusion by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was accurate in differentiating synovial sarcoma from other STS (N = 532; sensitivity = 93%, CI 85–96; specificity = 99%, CI 96–100). The presence of a CTNNB1 S45F mutation detected by PCR was a risk factor for decreased recurrence-free survival in desmoid tumors (N = 418; hazard ratio from 3.50 [CI 1.51–8.14] to 6.20 [CI 2.24–17.15]).ConclusionsSarcomas are rare cancers whose molecular pathogenesis is becoming increasingly understood. The current evidence demonstrates that molecular analyses are useful in the diagnosis and prediction of prognosis in some STS.
https://ift.tt/2r5faIT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου