To the Editor Cann et al conducted an interesting study to evaluate the associations of 3 body composition measures with overall survival (OS) in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Comparing patients with and without sarcopenia, the authors report a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.18-1.69). Although a statistically significant association between sarcopenia and OS was established, a 40% increase in the HR for sarcopenia is difficult to interpret clinically. The hazard cannot be interpreted as a risk (ie, the chance or likelihood of an event occurring). Moreover, without the background hazard function as a benchmark in patients without sarcopenia, a 40% increase might not amount to a clinically meaningful difference. Furthermore, when the HR is not constant over time, it is unclear how to interpret the observed HR.
https://ift.tt/2S0IJGq
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Summary Insulinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours that classically present with fasting hypoglycaemia. This case report discusses an un...
-
The online platform for Taylor & Francis Online content New for Canadian Journal of Remote Sen...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου