The authors are to be commended for highlighting the need for further high quality evidence to assist surgical decision making in the management of nerve injuries and for encouraging critical appraisal of available studies. Whilst it cannot be the responsibility of the individual surgeon to undertake randomised control trials (RCTs) and systematically review (SR) all available literature it is our duty of care to ensure our knowledge is best updated and our privilege to safely action innovations in our field.
https://ift.tt/2Ra9f02
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Παρασκευή 23 Νοεμβρίου 2018
Commentary to accompany the paper: The Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Summary Insulinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours that classically present with fasting hypoglycaemia. This case report discusses an un...
-
The online platform for Taylor & Francis Online content New for Canadian Journal of Remote Sen...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου