Source:Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Author(s): Bara Alsalaheen, Ryan Bean, Andrea Almeida, James Eckner, Matthew Lorincz
BackgroundThe majority of studies examining the role of cervical muscles on head-neck kinematics focused on musculoskeletal attributes (e.g. strength). Cervical neuromuscular response to perturbation may represent a divergent construct that has not been examined under various perturbation conditions. This study examined the association between cervical musculoskeletal attributes and cervical neuromuscular response of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) to perturbation. Furthermore, this study examined the effect of anticipation and preload on the SCM neuromuscular response.MethodsNineteen participants completed measurement of SCM muscle size, cervical flexion maximal voluntary isometric contraction, and the neuromuscular response of the SCM to cervical perturbation. Cervical perturbation was delivered by dropping a 1.59 kg mass from a loading apparatus. The impulsive load was delivered under four conditions: 1) Anticipated perturbation with no preload (A-NP), 2) Unanticipated perturbation with no preload (U-NP), 3) Anticipated perturbation with preload (A-P), and 4) Unanticipated perturbation with preload (U-P).ResultsNone of the cervical musculoskeletal attributes were correlated with the SCM cervical neuromuscular response. This study demonstrated significant effect of preloading and anticipation on baseline EMG amplitude and EMG onset latency for the SCM. Furthermore, there was a significant effect of preloading on average EMG response amplitude for the SCM.DiscussionThe findings of this study indicate that cervical neuromuscular response of the SCM is different from musculoskeletal attributes and is influenced by perturbation conditions. These findings provide conceptual support to examine the neuromuscular response of the SCM in mitigating head-neck kinematics.
http://ift.tt/2nxLlPb
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου