Summary
Objective
A label change for testosterone (T) products in March 2015 followed a highly-publicized FDA advisory committee meeting in September 2014. Changes included a warning of possible increased cardiovascular (CV) risks and restriction of indicated populations to younger men with a limited set of known etiologies of testosterone deficiency (TD). These changes greatly impacted clinical practice and public perception of T therapy (TTh). Our aim was to review these changes in light of subsequently published studies.
Design
We identified 23 studies through June 2017, including 12 clinical trials and 11 observational studies. The Testosterone Trials included 790 men 65y and older with TD without known etiology, assigned to 1y T gel or placebo.
Results
Demonstrated benefits of T included sexual activity and desire, physical activity, and mood. There were 9 major adverse CV events (MACE) in the T arm and 16 in the placebo arm. No study reported increased MACE with TTh. A 3y RCT showed no difference in carotid atherosclerosis. Several large observational studies reported reduced CV events with TTh, including one showing progressively reduced CV and mortality risk with greater duration of TTh. Men whose serum T normalized with TTh had reduced risk of MI and death compared with men whose T levels failed to normalize.
Conclusion
We conclude that existing evidence fails to support increased CV risk with TTh; on the contrary, there is evidence suggestive of real-world CV benefits. Finally, existing evidence provides benefits of TTh in older men without known etiology for T deficiency.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://ift.tt/2ot4WAy
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου