Publication date: Available online 27 March 2017
Source:Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Author(s): Caroline E. Spence, Magda Osman, Alan G. McElligott
Are animals capable of empathy, problem-solving, or even self-recognition? Much research is dedicated to answering these questions and yet few studies have considered how humans form beliefs about animal minds. Evidence suggests that our mentalising of animals is a natural consequence of Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities. However, where beliefs regarding animal mind have been investigated, there has been slow progress in establishing the mechanism underpinning how this is achieved. Here, we consider what conclusions can be drawn regarding how people theorise about animal minds and the different conceptual and methodological issues that might limit the accuracy of conclusions currently drawn from this work. We suggest a new empirical framework for better capturing the human theory of animal mind, which in turn has significant political and social implications.
http://ift.tt/2o127aU
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Ετικέτες
Τρίτη 28 Μαρτίου 2017
Theory of Animal Mind: Human Nature or Experimental Artefact?
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Abstract The changes of dissolved organic matter (DOM) components during stabilization process play significant effects on its redox prope...
-
Publication date: September 2017 Source: European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), Volume 43, Issue 9 http://ift.tt/2gezJ2D
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου