Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?

Publication date: January 2018
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 89
Author(s): Marloes Swets, Peter J.K. Kuppen, Erik J. Blok, Hans Gelderblom, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, Iris D. Nagtegaal
BackgroundSeveral histological high-risk factors are used as an indication for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. Those and other factors, including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), venous invasion and tumour budding are associated with decreased outcome. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive values of these biomarkers in a cohort of rectal cancer patients.Materials and methodsThe trial-based cohort consisted of 221npTNM stage II–III rectal cancer patients, included in the PROCTOR/SCRIPT trial, a multicentre randomised phase III trial. Patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and TME surgery were randomised between adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Lymphatic invasion, PNI, extramural venous invasion, intramural venous invasion and tumour budding were determined in standard tissue slides.ResultsThe presence of PNI (HR 3.36; 95% CI 1.82–6.21), extramural vascular invasion (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17–3.19) and tumour budding (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.03) was associated with a significant worse overall survival. The presence of ≥2 adverse biomarkers resulted in a stronger prediction of adverse outcome in terms of overall survival (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.66–4.79), disease-free survival (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.47–3.48), and distant recurrence (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.56–4.02). None of these markers alone or combined predicted a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.DiscussionWe confirmed that several stage-independent biomarkers were significantly associated with a decreased outcome in rectal cancer patients. More importantly, these markers did not have predictive value and are thus not useful to select for adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.



http://ift.tt/2AF2xYe